Tam School District to spend $450million 

Follow Marin Events

• HomeUpTam School District to spend $450millionUSPS Petaluma replaced by OaklandWHAT ARE SPECIAL DISTRICTS2016 Election MeasuresABAG MTC Stifle DissentMarin's Law Suit against Fossil Fuel Corps.AB 2406 Junior Dwelling Unitsis a Marin Charter School being favored?Marijuana in MarinCut the Cord or just cut ComcastReverse MortgageNoisey NeighborSecurity BreachesSome ECLECTIC Shopping CatalogsMarin Bike Count - $28 Million WastedJohn Muir Transcription ProjectTRUE GOPHER STORYHigh Sierra Lakes •
•  •

The Tamalpais Union High School District (TUHSD)
Facilities Master Plan (FMP) for each school's long-range needs

     
 It will cost each property owner $30 per $100,000 assessed valuation annually . The owner of a typical district property would see a tax increase of $300 at the start, growing to over $500 annually over 30 years.  
Cumulative cost would exceed $12,000 per parcel.  

Board of Trustees Meeting  vote on July 18 on moving the ballot measure process forward by hiring a campaign strategist for a bond offering and possible parcel tax.  6PM
       Location:  Kreps Conference Room (Redwood HS), Dougherty Dr., Larkspur
15.F. Discussion and Approval of a Capital Campaign Strategist (approx. 7:10 pm) 
( shouldn't  Science, Arts, CTE and Elective Programs be 3 separate costs?)

  The Tamalpais Union High School District (TUHSD, Tam District, or District) is located in the cities of Larkspur, Mill Valley, and San Anselmo. TUHSD serves  4,679 pupils.
  • Tamalpais HS -----------1,537,
  • Sir Francis Drake HS - 1,142,
  • Redwood HS ----------- 1,807,
  • San Andreas HS ---------- 85,
  • Tamiscal HS,
  • Total HS Enrollment -- 4,679.

In September 2016, the District awarded the contract for master planning services to LPA, Inc.

   

CBS TV Report

Tamalpais UHSD Masterplan

Larkspur, CA April 12, 2017


 

School Site

Total


 

Program Scope

Redwood HS

San Andreas HS

Sir Francis

Drake HS

Tamalpais HS

Tamiscal HS

Education

Center

Maintenance &

Operations


 

A. Modernize / Reconfigure Existing Classrooms and Labs

$ 2,240,944

$ 763,016

$2,544,197

$ 4,769,480

 

 

 

$10,317,637

B. Existing Building Systems, Toilets and Improved Energy Efficiency

$ 1,168,323

 

$3,986,776

$ 2,023,764

$ 415,215

 

 

$ 7,594,078

C. Site Utilities

 

 

$ 412,959

 

$ 159,600

 

$ 13,300

$ 585,859

D. New Construction (Classrooms)

$ 22,179,255

 

$6,448,310

 

$ 2,506,920

$ 3,230,379

 

$ 34,364,865

E. Science, Arts, CTE and Elective Programs

$ 21,268,819

$ 1,987,365

$15,212,309

$ 23,046,479

$ 1,351,059

 

 

$ 62,866,031

F. Performing Arts Improvements

$ 21,472,617

 

$19,356,101

$ 8,259,502

 

 

 

$ 49,088,221

G. MPR, Student Union and Food Service Improvements

$ 13,084,279

$ 1,694,460

 

 

$ 757,653

 

 

$ 15,536,392

H. Physical Education Improvements

$ 3,548,187

$ 827,366

$6,695,060

$ 3,850,350

 

 

 

$ 14,920,964

I. Administration and Staff Support

$ 512,795

$ 1,365,538

$1,087,874

$ 478,800

$ 934,618

$ 16,514,615

$ 602,797

$ 21,497,036

J. Library and Student Support Services

 

$ 1,007,395

$2,421,531

$ 1,709,316

$ 616,694

 

 

$ 5,754,937

K. Safety and Security

$ 4,892,739

$ 288,333

$3,091,951

$ 5,834,497

$ 119,700

$ 31,920

 

$ 14,259,140

L. Parking and Drop-off

 

 

$ 357,504

$ 17,375,699

 

$ 1,454,156

$ 430,122

$ 19,617,480

M. Outdoor Learning Environments and Quads

$ 3,005,651

$ 105,815

$1,360,343

$ 903,230

 

$ 224,078

 

$ 5,599,116

N. Exterior Play Spaces, Playfields and Hardcourts

$ 8,799,785

 

$6,036,391

$ 9,198,945

 

 

 

$ 24,035,122

O. Next Generation Classroom Flexibility

$ 2,040,000

$ 240,000

$1,320,000

$ 2,040,000

$ 150,000

 

 

$ 5,790,000

P. Technology Infrastructure

$ 3,724,560

$ 161,280

$2,177,438

$ 3,888,591

$ 100,800

 

 

$ 10,052,669

TOTAL PROJECT COST

$107,937,955

$ 8,440,567

$72,508,743

$ 83,378,653

$ 7,112,259

$ 21,455,148

$ 1,046,219

$301,879,546

The votes on which projects to prioritize

Enrollment Projection

High School

2017

2027

Cumulative Growth/
(Decline)

Tamalpais HS

1,537

1,510

-27

Sir Francis Drake HS

1,142

977

-165

Redwood HS

1,807

1,975

+168

San Andreas HS[1]

85

85

 

Tamiscal HS[1]

108

108

 

Total HS Enrollment[2]

4,679

4,655

-24

Map of those affected by this proposed Property Tax Increase

H.S. District Board to Vote 7/18 re Hiring Strategist for $450 million Bond Measure Campaign & Parcel Tax

Hiring Consultant Would Further Advance TUHSD's Plan for $450 Million Bond Measure and Parcel Tax.
 
The Tamalpais Union High School District (TUHSD) will be deciding Tuesday July 18 whether to hire a "campaign strategist" for  

  1. (1) a proposed $450 million bond measure in 2018 and 

  2. (2) a possible parcel tax -- of size not yet determined -- in 2020 to cover rising operating expenses.  
    Contracting a campaign consultant further propels TUHSD toward a bond offering with proceeds directed to substantially redesigning three major high school campuses: Redwood, Tamalpais, and Drake.  The extensive project list (Facilities Master Plan, or FMP) was developed through an extensive consultant-directed on-campus wish-list process that regrettably did not include off-campus stakeholders such as taxpayers, city planners and city councils.
    The draft FMP wish list equates to the maximum school bond measure permitted under CA laws: It will cost each property owner $30/$100,000 assessed valuation annually for 30 years. The owner of a typical district property would see a tax increase of $300 at the start, growing to over $500 annually.  Cumulative cost to the typical current Marin homeowner would exceed $12,000.  
    (Plans for a parcel tax are not as well developed yet.  The district believes rising expenses -- salaries, health benefits, and pensions --  should be addressed with a parcel tax measure.) 
    Now is the time to learn more and to let the board know what you think.  Each step of the process adds to the sunk cost and inertial momentum. 
    Learn about the bond measure and Facilities Master Plan:
     - Marin Voice op/ed re TUHSD FMP process and bond measure. (see below)
     - Complete Draft FMP here: For financial summary see pages 58-9 and 71
    -  FMP Powerpoint presentation (including enrollment forecasts on page 50 showing a near-term enrollment uptick, then returning to current levels) 

ACTIONS: Comment on TUHSD FMP Bond Financing

Attend upcoming board meetings and speak during public comment:
 
        Tuesday July 18  -  Agenda includes approval of selection of Whitehurst/Mosher as campaign strategist for bond and/or parcel tax measures.  Hiring the strategist would continue forward momentum toward a potential $450 million bond measure to fund major campus overhauls and/or a parcel tax for rising operating expenses.  

       TUHSD meetings start at 6PM
       Location:  Kreps Conference Room (Redwood HS), Dougherty Dr., Larkspur

Email TUHSD directors with your thoughts about FMP and bond financing:
        Laura Anderson, President:
        landerson@tamdisrict.org

        Leslie Lundgren, Clerk:
        llundgren@tamdistrict.org

        Barbara Owens, Director:
        bowens@tamdistrict.org

        Michael Futterman, Director:
        mfutterman@tamdistrict.org
       
        Chuck Ford, Director:
        cford@tamdistrict.org

 


Marin Voice: Tam bond measure needs input from all stakeholders
By Robert Miltner and Laura Effel

POSTED: 07/12/17, 9:45 AM PDT  

At a Tamalpais Union High School District board meeting on July 18, the trustees will consider adopting a “Facilities Master Plan” to overhaul Redwood, Tamalpais and Sir Francis Drake high school campuses.**   Implementation would require a bond of $450 million for us taxpayers to vote on. With interest, this could cost nearly $1 billion.
You didn’t get notice? Hardly anyone did.
Stakeholders whose views were solicited in drafting this Facilities Master Plan did not include taxpayers. Only students, teachers, administrators and parents counted as stakeholders.
So, the draft master plan looks like a wish list, not a budget for addressing urgent needs or considering available funds.
If you knew to look for the Facilities Master Plan draft on the district’s website, you would find the proposed project list, which seemingly totals $300 million. The draft mentions items “excluded from this budget.”
Only by attending the district’s board meeting of June 13 or by watching the video recording of it would you have learned from the district’s consultant that the amount of additional “excluded item” costs would be $150 million, raising the project’s total construction-related tab to $450 million before interest expense.

A bond measure to fund this would increase property taxes $300 annually on a home in the district with an assessed value of $1 million.
For bond measures, there is no exclusion for senior citizens.
The high schools in this district are already excellent schools. We are rightly proud of their high quality.
That said, we believe this proposal is vastly out of reach.
The current tax burden on homeowners is not inconsiderable, and taxpayers have become aware that public agencies are not prudent in using our money.
A few examples: $1 billion of unfunded employee retirement benefits, the SMART train’s serious financial shortfalls, a possible Marin transportation sales tax increase above the state-mandated limit, repeated increases in water rates — and the list goes on.
Many of us are sensitive to any new proposals for more taxes.
More important, this proposed Facilities Master Plan falls outside of what is needed.
We have spent time in the corridors and rooms of these schools, attended sporting and performance events and been to many meetings with teachers and school administrators. The facilities never seemed inadequate; nor did the kids complain that they wished the schools had more this, or better that.

The teachers themselves were the most important resource. And for good reason, as the faculty members were, and surely still are, outstanding.

Despite the lack of inclusiveness of the Facilities Master Plan process, we do not believe the district intended to sneak up on us taxpayers, as it appears to have done.
The trustees all seem to be caring public servants who listen and want to do what is right. But they have gotten swept away by a process they are now finding difficult to stop.
With your encouragement they can stop or scale back this out-of-control process.
If the board approves the Facilities Master Plan at the July 18 meeting, the next step would be for the board to vote to approve a bond measure for the ballot.**
This could happen as early as late July. We urge you to become informed, weigh in, and attend the July 18 board meeting.
Robert Miltner and Laura Effel are residents of Larkspur. Mr. Miltner’s two children graduated from Redwood and are now in graduate school at Ivy League campuses.
the board will vote on July 18 on moving the ballot measure process forward by hiring a campaign strategist for a bond offering and possible parcel tax.


 

Questions? info@MarinInfo.org